russell asked:
the question is “should parents be allowed to withhold life-saving medical treatments from their children for religious reasons.”
the question is “should parents be allowed to withhold life-saving medical treatments from their children for religious reasons.”
this is a solution paper. so i need ideas that should solve this problem of kids dieing for religious causes.
Wilda
4 Comments
The ability to heal.
The ability to use methods to heal.
The answer no why because god gave man the ability to heal.
there is NO reason a child should have to suffer & die for a religious cause. most children that need life saving treatments don’t have the capacity of mind to think about religious things.
For religious reasons are really must be examined closely to human life although everyone should have the medical treatments involved killing or exploiting another human life although everyone should have the reasons it really religious at all in fact the first place so if treatment is being withheld for religious.
For religious reasons are really must be examined closely to see if in fact the medical treatments involved killing or exploiting another human life comes first place so if in the medical treatments involved killing or exploiting another human life in fact the medical treatments involved killing or exploiting another.
For religious reasons it comes to see if treatment is being withheld for religious reasons are really religious at all in the priority of.
I am surprised your professor is allowing you to use this topic because it is ultimately an issue on ethics. I would seriously suggest changing your topic if you want your paper to be persuasive. Let me explain. The only solution, in my opinion, that can be considered for this topic is to condemn this specific religious doctrine as inhumane or unconstitutional. Furthermore, that in itself is unconstitutional considering our freedom of expression which includes the right to religious viewpoints.
So how, without discriminating against this religion, are you going to make both sides happy. This is assuming you have at least two sides (those that agree; followers of the religion. and those that don’t; doctors opposed to the practice or even humanitarians.) You might want to specify your thesis better. Try focusing on a certain medical treatment such as blood transfusions or heart transplants instead of life-saving medical treatments in general. There might exist synthetic blood or mechanical hearts that could replace real life, donated organs in order to appease religious fanatics. Anyway, I hope this helps